Recently, I’ve been interviewed by some of the major Danish newspapers on the problems that growth companies face when trying to get credit from their banks. You can find the articles from Morgenavisen Jyllands-Posten and Berlingske Tidende here (links in Danish).
I’d also like to share with you my views expressed in my own terms – below you can read a translated version of my comments published in Berlingske Tidende (link in Danish):
No go, banks are telling us apologetically, when we meet with them full of expectations and plans for how we wish to develop our business over the coming years. A business which in 10 years has become extremely profitable through massive growth, with more than 40,000 customers and expansion into 10 countries.
We present them with all circumstantial information so no questions can remain about our solidity. As our latest achievement, we have received a Gazelle award and been named Most Profitable Gazelle in the Copenhagen region.
Additionally, we are among the 5% of Danish companies that have obtained an AAA credit rating. Vækstfonden (the Danish state investment fund) has provided a guarantee of DKK 10 million based on their evaluation of our company. This means that Vækstfonden will cover 75% of any losses suffered by banks who lend us money.
It’s an uphill struggle trying to impress banks. The message coming from them is that we are a sound company – yet our credit is down by 50% from 2008. Take it or leave it. To obtain credit, you need to be able to provide production or physical stock as collateral. Our company provides a web-based accounting solution, meaning that we are as far from physical production as you can get.
Astoundingly, despite our thousands of customers domestically and in foreign markets, we are not in the same category as companies that possess a physical stock or real estate. And, one might ask, how much security does real estate offer anyway, with real estate prices spiralling downwards and now at the same level as in 2003/2004?
Also, why don’t banks educate their staff on the differences between knowledge-based and production-based companies so they can align their banking products with business realities?
Everyone agrees that knowledge-based companies, not production-based companies, are necessary for Denmark to thrive in the future.
Perhaps the government should play a more active role in this, driving the process forward when wariness is holding us back? If we really want sustainable companies that create growth and jobs, one solution is for the government to act as a bank and lend money to companies through Finansiel Stabilitet A/S (state-owned financial institution).
The government could also empower Vækstfonden to force banks to lend the money vouched for by Vækstfonden. If Vækstfonden has no real authority or use, it should be removed from the national budget.
Let’s get a debate going on this. Perhaps it’s just wishful thinking, but things would be a lot easier if the business world and the banking world had the same view on the basic facts and the same vision for the future.
Unleash the growth potential
As a final note to this blog post, let me just add that fortunately our company is seeing massive growth, has a strong cash flow and can go a long way without the full support of a bank. From this privileged position, I feel obligated to speak out on what I consider a critical issue, in the hope that this will eventually help improving conditions for the many hard-working companies with great growth potential that hold the key to future growth in Denmark.