Last week, I was interviewed in the Danish business media about my experience with banks and obtaining loans as a growth company.
Here, I described our paradoxical situation: We can present excellent results over the past years in terms of both growth and profitability (hence our newly-awarded title as Most Profitable Gazelle in the Copenhagen region), our number of customers is increasing rapidly, and we have a well-proven business case – yet, our credit in the bank has gone down by 50% over the past three years.
The explanation from the bank? Everything about our company looks fine, except that we don’t have a physical stock or real estate to offer as collateral.
Flawed argument
This is a flawed argument on at least two grounds:
First, no matter how well software companies like us perform we will by definition never be able to meet this requirement, yet no-one will dispute that software companies can be very profitable businesses nonetheless (in fact, the general consensus is that IT and other knowledge industries is one of the main opportunities for growth in Denmark).
And second, as the financial recession of the past years has made it very clear, physical collateral such as real estate really doesn’t constitute the security that the bank sector still seem to think it does.
Identifying sustainable businesses
A bit cheekily, but also seriously, I would suggest that bank staff with decision-making responsibilities become better educated and equipped at identifying and supporting sustainable businesses. In fact, they could start by simply taking a look at other authorities’ evaluation of growth companies.
In our case, we can point to an AAA credit rating, held by only 5% of companies in Denmark.
Furthermore, we have a DKK 10 million guarantee from Vækstfonden (the Danish state investment fund) in place, based on their evaluation of the conditions and sustainability of our company.
This guarantee means that Vækstfonden will cover 75% of losses from our loan, thus minimizing the risk that banks will run.
Change the system
Yet these factors have not been enough to convince banks to even maintain our credit level. For the bank sector, the overriding concern is to cut down costs and reduce losses, to a large extent as a way of meeting the demands of the government’s Bank Packages.
So, if the government really wants to ensure that sustainable growth companies can thrive, the system needs to be changed.
How to move forward
The way I see it, what is required is for the government to play a more active role in helping growth companies.
One way to do this is for the state to act as a bank proper and lend money to companies through Finansiel Stability A/S (state-owned financial institution).
Another way is by actively forcing banks to accept guarantees from Vækstfonden so that companies can use these as vouchers that enable them to obtain a bank loan with the full amount from the guarantee.
If you have any other ideas or suggestions for how to improve this situation, please let me know by leaving a comment.